Marc Goldberg's Blog

While few things in life are ever complete, this does fall into the category of complete BS.  Taken to its logical extreme, this argument would have you believe that a single-character password is most secure.  I suggest the letter d, is most secure; it stands for dillweed.

Further, even if this were true (which it most certainly is NOT), AmEx would purportedly attempt to protect against software that was somehow installed on my computer at the expense of protection from good ‘ol fashioned brute-force, which they’ve made FAR easier by restricting the max length AND characters used.  BTW, if I ended up with someone’s keystroke logging software on my keyboard, I’m pretty much screwed if my password is 1 character or 101 characters, doesn’t matter.

Regardless, I refuse to believe that the technologists at AmEx are so mind-numbingly incompetent as to render this explanation accurate.  This is clearly a case of email support incompetence.  The 8 character-max password is also the result of incompetence, but is unrelated to the BS spewed by that particular support rep.

I’m passionate about this particular issue because I too am a customer of AmEx.  I’ll followup here later with my own experience asking this same question.

marco:

(via iamdanw)

The reasons given don’t sound quite right. If there’s really anything to this, I’d love if an expert in the matter could enlighten me with the details.

Translation: This sounds like bullshit, but if I’m wrong, I don’t want to appear too ignorant.

  1. kennethlove reblogged this from enlavin and added:
    So that’s where I’ve been going wrong! I haven’t been using enough alphabets in my passwords. enlavin:
  2. supafamous reblogged this from ataferner
  3. ryanthejenks reblogged this from ataferner and added:
    Are you kidding me? Where did...guy learn about online security?!
  4. webmarc reblogged this from marco and added:
    While few things in life are ever complete, this does fall into the category of complete BS. Taken
  5. cowsandmilk reblogged this from marco and added:
    I’ll skip out on commenting on the American Express response, but the idea that you can’t have an 8 character...
  6. christopherattle reblogged this from lkm and added:
    This guy needs two things, fast, in whichever order is easiest: sodium pentathol cockpunch
  7. a-interest reblogged this from marco and added:
    Yes, that is utter bullshit. I reckon the reason is that their password hash algorithm probably ignores everything after...
  8. reidgober reblogged this from marco
  9. lkm reblogged this from ataferner and added:
    O_o Translation from technobullshit to human: “I’m high as...kite.” Seriously. None...
  10. toldorknown reblogged this from marco and added:
    It’s a crock. As I’m sure you know, encrypted characters are all equally easy to decrypt, which is to say virtually...
  11. fowkswe reblogged this from marco and added:
    Always wondered this myself. It seems...a weak security measure for a major financial...
  12. marco reblogged this from iamdanw
  13. zerolab reblogged this from ataferner
  14. iamdanw reblogged this from ataferner
  15. janhapke reblogged this from ataferner
  16. stammy reblogged this from ataferner and added:
    FAILLLLLLLLLLLLL
  17. enlavin reblogged this from ataferner
  18. jessta reblogged this from ataferner and added:
    easily enough, alphanumeric, that’s 32^8 = 1099511627776 You can’t brute force that without getting noticed. But still...